Differences involving fruit places. The values represent the imply amount of fruit location SE (n = three). Tukey’s HSD test (p 0.05) was applied for Although there was an Asimadoline In Vitro increase in significantduring the amongst fruit places.the 20th means separation. The letters indicate harm differences storage period untilday, the degree of damage that created in between the 10th along with the 20th day of storage Even though there was an increase in harm in the course of the storage period till the 20th was slight. CI changed quickly involving the 20th plus the 35th day of cold storage. The day, the degree was, in general, significantly less severe for fruit harvested plus the 20th day of storage degree of CI of harm that developed among the 10th from INS trees AA-CW236 Technical Information around the 35th day was slight. index: less than slight injury) comparedandSHA 35th dayindex, slight injury) and (1.66, CI CI changed swiftly between the 20th towards the (2.25, CI of cold storage. The degree of CI was,index, almost very extreme injury) trees, see Figure 6.trees on the 35th day SUN (4.22, CI in general, significantly less extreme for fruit harvested from INS (1.66, CI index: significantly less than slight injury) when compared with SHA (2.25, CI index, slight injury) and SUN (4.22, CI index, practically incredibly severe injury) trees, see Figure six. three.two. Antioxidant enzyme Activities The alterations inside the antioxidant enzyme activities (unit g-1 FW) as a function of storage three.2.time in days Enzymebiological variations of `Zibda’ mango below low temperature were Antioxidant for the Activities The alterations inside the antioxidant enzyme activities (unit g-1 FW) as a function of storage illustrated (Figure 7). Clearly, the antioxidant enzymes exhibited a significant interaction time in 0.05 whenbiological variations of `Zibda’ mango beneath low temperature were at p days for the the storage time and fruit locations have been thought of. Initially, there illustrated (Figure 7). Clearly, the antioxidant enzymes exhibitedharvest time general for the had been different values for the antioxidant enzyme activities at a significant interaction at p 0.05 when the storage time activity elevated have been regarded as. Initially, there have been enzymes. The APX enzyme and fruit places to attain its maximum on the 20th day. On the other hand, the POD, antioxidant enzyme activities at their peak around the 15th day endifferent values for the CAT, and SOD enzymes reached harvest time all round for theof cold storage. APX enzyme activity increased to attain its maximum on the 20th day. Howzymes. TheObviously, fruits around the INS side of trees exhibited higher antioxidant activities for all enzymes in comparison to fruits from the SHA and SUN sides 15th day of storage at 4 ever, the POD, CAT, and SOD enzymes reached their peak around the during coldcold storage. C. Nevertheless, fruits picked from the SUN side showed a powerful decline in activities for all Of course, fruits around the INS side of trees exhibited greater antioxidantantioxidant enzyme activities right after the 20th day until the end and cold storage period. enzymes in comparison with fruits in the SHAof theSUN sides in the course of cold storage at 4 . Having said that, fruits picked in the SUN side showed a sturdy decline in antioxidant enzyme activities after the 20th day till the finish of the cold storage period.Horticulturae 2021, 7, 515 Horticulturae 2021, 7, x FOR PEER REVIEW8 of 17 8 ofFigure six. The distinctive responses to low storage temperature due to fruit place on the trees. Figure six. The distinct responses to low storage temperature as a consequence of fruit location on the trees.3.three. MDA, PCG, EL , along with a.
