Ith estradiol benzoate has several advantages. It provides constant hormone release and it can be prepared in the laboratory at a relatively low cost. The disadvantage is that it is time consuming and the consistency in the amount of estradiol released will depend on the amount of estradiol packed into the Silastic tube, as well as the length, diameter and permeability of the Silastic tube. Other commonly employed methods for estradiol administration include subcutaneous insertion of commercial pellets (Innovative Research (Sarasota, FL) or osmotic mini-pumps (for example AlzetTM). Commercial pellets and Alzet mini-pumps are good alternatives to the Silastic tubes, but are much more expensive. In our Lurbinectedin web fields of study, the literature contains many reports of contradictory effects of estradiol. We surmised that these discrepancies may be attributed in part to differences in the method of estradiol GSK343 msds replacement and in the methodology used to measure plasma estradiol, particularly when purchasing commercially available RIA kits. Several studies have demonstrated the great variability that exists in the values of plasma estradiol obtained depending on the method (RIA, ELISA), type of kit (coated tubes versus secondary antibodies) and company used [16,17]. This study was designed to evaluate plasma levels of estradiol attained by two commonly used methods of estradiol replacement: commercial pellets and Silastic tube implants. For each method we used different doses of estradiol pellets and of Silastic tubes and measured plasma estradiol and body weight every week for 4 weeks. In addition, we assessed the effect of constant exposure to estradiol on locomotor activity and anxiety behaviors.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptMaterials and MethodsAnimals and housing Adult female Sprague-Dawley rats of approximately 200 g were purchased from Hilltop Lab Animals (Scottdale, PA). Rats were maintained in a 12:12-h light-dark cycle (lights off at 6 pm), in a temperature (25 ) and humidity controlled room at the University of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus (UPR MSC) AAALAC accredited animal facility. Animals were housed two per cage with tap water and food (TEK 22/5 rodent diet 8640) provided ad libitum. A period of 1 week was given for acclimation to the animal facilities before any animal manipulation. All animal experimental procedures followed the National Institute of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) from the UPR MSC. Estradiol implants Silastic tubing implants were prepared according to Legan et al. and modified according to Febo et al. [18,19]. Briefly, 5 mm Silastic tubes (1.47 mm internal diameter, 1.97 mm outside diameter; Dow Corning, distributed by Fisher Scientific, Cayey, Puerto Rico) were filled with 3, 4 and 5 mg of 17–estradiol 3-benzoate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) or left empty. These tubes were sealed at each end with sterile silicone adhesive sealant. Silastic implants were placed in a 0.9 sterile saline solution 3 hrs prior to use to confirm the integrity of the tubes. Those that did not float at the end of this period were discarded.J Vet Sci Technol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 March 07.Mosquera et al.PageCommercial pellets of 17–estradiol (3 mg and 4 mg) were purchased from Innovative Research (Sarasota, FL) to compare its delivery efficiency with that of the estrad.Ith estradiol benzoate has several advantages. It provides constant hormone release and it can be prepared in the laboratory at a relatively low cost. The disadvantage is that it is time consuming and the consistency in the amount of estradiol released will depend on the amount of estradiol packed into the Silastic tube, as well as the length, diameter and permeability of the Silastic tube. Other commonly employed methods for estradiol administration include subcutaneous insertion of commercial pellets (Innovative Research (Sarasota, FL) or osmotic mini-pumps (for example AlzetTM). Commercial pellets and Alzet mini-pumps are good alternatives to the Silastic tubes, but are much more expensive. In our fields of study, the literature contains many reports of contradictory effects of estradiol. We surmised that these discrepancies may be attributed in part to differences in the method of estradiol replacement and in the methodology used to measure plasma estradiol, particularly when purchasing commercially available RIA kits. Several studies have demonstrated the great variability that exists in the values of plasma estradiol obtained depending on the method (RIA, ELISA), type of kit (coated tubes versus secondary antibodies) and company used [16,17]. This study was designed to evaluate plasma levels of estradiol attained by two commonly used methods of estradiol replacement: commercial pellets and Silastic tube implants. For each method we used different doses of estradiol pellets and of Silastic tubes and measured plasma estradiol and body weight every week for 4 weeks. In addition, we assessed the effect of constant exposure to estradiol on locomotor activity and anxiety behaviors.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptMaterials and MethodsAnimals and housing Adult female Sprague-Dawley rats of approximately 200 g were purchased from Hilltop Lab Animals (Scottdale, PA). Rats were maintained in a 12:12-h light-dark cycle (lights off at 6 pm), in a temperature (25 ) and humidity controlled room at the University of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus (UPR MSC) AAALAC accredited animal facility. Animals were housed two per cage with tap water and food (TEK 22/5 rodent diet 8640) provided ad libitum. A period of 1 week was given for acclimation to the animal facilities before any animal manipulation. All animal experimental procedures followed the National Institute of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) from the UPR MSC. Estradiol implants Silastic tubing implants were prepared according to Legan et al. and modified according to Febo et al. [18,19]. Briefly, 5 mm Silastic tubes (1.47 mm internal diameter, 1.97 mm outside diameter; Dow Corning, distributed by Fisher Scientific, Cayey, Puerto Rico) were filled with 3, 4 and 5 mg of 17–estradiol 3-benzoate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) or left empty. These tubes were sealed at each end with sterile silicone adhesive sealant. Silastic implants were placed in a 0.9 sterile saline solution 3 hrs prior to use to confirm the integrity of the tubes. Those that did not float at the end of this period were discarded.J Vet Sci Technol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 March 07.Mosquera et al.PageCommercial pellets of 17–estradiol (3 mg and 4 mg) were purchased from Innovative Research (Sarasota, FL) to compare its delivery efficiency with that of the estrad.
