Ter than that in Figure 4. Table two. As shown in Table 3, the
Ter than that in Figure four. Table 2. As shown in Table three, the calculation final results for the numerical simulation show that Gas-water separation AZD4625 In Vitro Efficiency at gas holdup five . because the total flow increases, the gas iquid separation efficiency progressively decreases. Only Total Flow total flow rate is 20 m3 /d does it meet the 40 20 30 50 60 when the (m3/d) condition assumption (e).90.five 84.four 79.five g Gas-water separation efficiency at gas holdup 10 . Table three. Total Flow (m3 /d) 20 3075.50 60 51.66.4.two. Gas ater Two-Phase Flow Separation 80.9 Efficiency with 10 Gas Holdup g 91.two 75.two 69.The gas-phase to water-phase ratio changes with out changing the total flow analysis variety. We studied the adjust comparison on the gas ater separation efficiency when the Tables two and 3 give a within the DGLS’s gas separation efficiency when the gas phase increases. As shownandFigure five, the gas holdup is 10 , and excellent gas ater separationWith gas content material is five in ten , respectively. The DGLS shows a the water holdup is 90 . the efficiency at a total rate of 20 mbubble size separation efficiency is related. When the flow flow boost in flow flow, the 3 /d, and the increases too. We divided the fluid 3 price in the inlet in to the gas ater separation impact bubble flow; (two) flow pattern domipattern exceeds 20 m /d, 3 scenarios: (1) VFD G/Wis steadily weakened. When the gas by VFD 5 plus the flow rate is 30 m3 /d 60 m3 /d, G/W bubble efficiency is significantly nation holdup isG/W bubble flow with supplemental D the separation flow; (three) flow pattern reduce than the is supplementedgas holdup of ten . In summary, under the premise of gas ater two-phase The by VFD G/W bubble flow and dominated by D G/D bubble flow. flow, the applicable array of DGLS is definitely the total flow price at 0 20 m3 /d. Higher gas holdup volume on the gas phase inside the central pipe also increases together with the improve inside the total and low flow rates lead to higher gas ater separation efficiency. flow rate. Each the content material and the size from the bubbles in Figure 5 are bigger than those in Figure 4, and also the gas ceiling formation is more rapidly than that in Figure 4. The gas expands, although the gas phase’s volume within the central pipe is also greater than that in Figure four.Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 10496 PEER Critique Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, x FOR11 of 21 11 of(a)(b)(c)(d)(e)Figure five. Cloud diagram of gas-phase distribution atat gas holdup ten when total flowat (a) 20 m3/d; three /d; (b) 3/d;m3 /d; Cloud diagram of gas-phase distribution gas holdup ten when total flow is is at (a) 20 m (b) 30 m 30 (c) 40 three m3 40 (d) 50 (d) 50 m /d; 3/d (c) /d; m3 /d; m /d; (e) 360 m(e) 60 m3 /dAs shown in Table 3, the calculation benefits for the numerical simulation five. Information Evaluation of Gas iquid Separation Efficiency in Multiphase Flow show that because the total flow increases, the gas iquid separation efficiency gas ater decreases. Only Section four explored the gas iquid separation efficiency of gradually two-phase flow. when the total flow price far20 UCB-5307 Purity & Documentation m3than theit meet the condition assumption (e). When the oil content is is less /d does total content material of gas ater two-phases flow, theoil phase is usually regarded as the water phase. Having said that, when the oil phase’ holdup does not meet this condition, the fluid medium have to be set as oil as ater three-phase flow for simulation investigation. This section discusses the relevant parameters when60 flow the Total Flow (m3/d) 20 30 40 50 medium is oil, gas, or water three-phase flow. The total flow is 20 m3 /d, 30 m3 /d, 40 m3 /d,.
