Ht of 0.0827 C/year inside the years from 2000 to 2019, though the vegetation greenness had an be the reason for the sudden drops inside the NDVI value inside the years of 2004006 and 2015. increasing trend. The interannual variation of temperature is extremely correlated with that Through the years from 2000 to 2019, the study region skilled growing precipitaof the vegetation greenness. The cooling impact of escalating vegetation was also reported tion and decreasing land Combretastatin A-1 Autophagy surface temperature (Figure 11). The spatial patterns of the prein [53]. cipitation and land surface temperature trends also agree with Figures 9 and ten. As we are able to see in Figure 10, the sudden drops in NDVI worth in 2004006 and 2015 are related towards the drop in precipitation in these years. The interannual variation of vegetation greenness is hugely correlated with that of precipitation. Hence, precipitation may be the cause for the sudden drops in the NDVI worth in the years of 2004006 and 2015. Through the years from 2000 to 2019, the study location skilled growing precipitation and decreasing land surface temperature (Figure 11). The spatial patterns from the precipitation and land surface temperature trends also agree with Figures 9 and ten.Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 4246 Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 4246 Remote Sens. 2021, 13,12 of 18 13 of 20 13 ofFigure 9. Interannual variation with the developing season vegetation greenness and land surface temperFigure 9. Interannual variation with the increasing season vegetation greenness and land surface temFigure 9. Two asterisks indicateof the developing the the vegetation greenness significance. ature. Two asterisks indicate thatthat slope is atis at 1 degree of statistical significance. surface temperature. Interannual variation the the slope season 1 degree of statistical and land perature. Two asterisks indicate that the slope is at the 1 degree of statistical significance.Figure 10. Interannual variation on the developing season vegetation greenness and precipitation. Figure ten. Interannual variationslope isgrowing season of statistical greennessand precipitation. Two Figure ten. Interannual that the of the developing seasonvegetation greenness and precipitation. Two asterisks indicate variation from the in the 1 level vegetation significance. Two asterisks indicate that the is at is 1 level amount of statistical significance. asterisks indicate that the slope IQP-0528 Purity slopetheat the 1 of statistical significance.Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 4246 Remote Sens. 2021, 13,13 of 18 14 ofFigure 11. Trends on the growing season precipitation (a) and temperature (b) inside the study location for Figure 11. Trends of your growing season precipitation (a) and temperature (b) inside the study location for the years from 2000 to 2019. the years from 2000 to 2019.five. Discussion 5. Discussion five.1. The Green-Up of Cropland and Natural Vegetation 5.1. The Green-Up of Cropland and Organic Vegetation The herbaceous and barren land has greened up a lot more than forests within this semi-arid The herbaceous and barren land has greened up a lot more than forests within this semi-arid region (Figure five). That is in portion because forests’ NDVI are bigger than those of nonregion (Figure five). This really is in component for non-forests outcomes inare bigger than these raise in forests–a little improve in NDVI due to the fact forests’ NDVI a big “percentage” of non-forests–a modest increase in NDVI for this semi-arid region, substantial forests and non-forests vegetation greenness. In general, innon-forests final results in awhere”percentage” boost in vegetati.
