And also the have already been carried out. Table 1 lists prior research working with IAA and also the respective experirespective experimental and methodological setup, which includes selected size fractions, XRD mental and methodological setup, like selected size fractions, XRD circumstances (type circumstances (kind of gear, aluminum holder/capillary tube, detector kind, and so forth.), illite of equipment, aluminum holder/capillary tube, detector variety, and so forth.), illite polytype quantipolytype quantification strategy, and dating 3-Chloro-5-hydroxybenzoic acid site patterns generatedbeen have IAA approach so be discussed in additional detail under. Various procedures have with proposed so far, and most are based onK-Ar and Ar-Ar strategies had been used as radiometric WILDFIRE[3,53,257,302]. Each simulated XRD patterns generated with WILDFIRE[3,53,257,302]. Both K-Ar and Ar-Ar approaches have been applied as radiometric dadating approaches (Table 1). ting methods (Table 1).Minerals 2021, 11,four ofTable 1. Summary of fault dating researches utilizing IAA for final 20 years, in which fault names, chosen size fractions, variety of XRD gear and holder, illite polytype quantification system, and raiometric dating strategy to every single study result. No. 1 two three four 5 six 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Fault Name Lewis thrust Moab Fault, Utah Faults in Canadian Rocky Mountains Anatolian Fault Sierra Mazatan detachment fault Fault with the Ruby Mountains San Andreas fault, Parkfield, Califonia Faults in AlpTransit deep tunnel web site West Qinling fault Pyrenean thrusts Deokpori Thrust Chugaryeong fault zone, Korea Daegwangri fault, Korea Inje fault, Kor.
