On the OWTs and the subsequent modelling of chl-a might be seen in Figure 11, exactly where several different OWTs had been retrieved per pixel for quite a few lakes in GLPG-3221 Purity & Documentation central astern Ontario.Figure 7. Regressions of observed chl-a to to (a) (B/R) results in OWT-A (B/G) results in OWT-Bh ; (c) [(B/G) [(B/G) Figure 7. Regressionsof observed ln ln chl-a (a) (B/R) outcomes in OWT-Ah ; (b) h; (b) (B/G) results in OWT-Bh; (c)(R/G)] (R/G)] in OWT-Ch (d) (G/N) in OWT-D ; (e) (B/N) in OWT-E (f) [(G/R) N] in OWT-Fh ; (g) [(B/G) (R/N)] OWT-Gh ; and in OWT-Ch;; (d) (G/N) in OWT-Dhh;(e) (B/N) in OWT-Eh ; h; (f) [(G/R) N] in OWT-Fh; (g) [(B/G) (R/N)] in in OWT-Gh; and (h) (h) [(R/B) (R/N)] lakes (“global”). [(R/B) (R/N)] in all in all lakes (“global”).Remote Sens. 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEWRemote Sens. 2021, 13, 4607 15 ofFigure (b) Ten-fold cross validation final results(R/G)] in OWT-C ; (d) (G/N) in OWT-D of(e) (B/N) in OWT-Eto(f) [(G/R) N] 8. (B/G) outcomes in OWT-B ; (c) [(B/G) for linear regression predictions ; observed chl-a ; (a) (B/R) final results in OWT h h h h Ah; (b) in OWT-Fh ; (g) [(B/G) (R/N)] in OWT-Gh(R/G)] in OWT-Ch; (d)in all lakes (“global”).h; (e) (B/N) in OWT-Eh; (f) [(G/R) N (B/G) outcomes in OWT-Bh; (c) [(B/G) ; and (h) [(R/B) (R/N)] (G/N) in OWT-D in OWT-Fh; (g) [(B/G) (R/N)] in OWT-Gh; and (h) [(R/B) (R/N)] in all lakes (“global”).Figure eight. Ten-fold cross validation results for linear regression predictions of observed chl-a to (a) (B/R) outcomes in OWT-Ah ;Remote Sens. 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEWRemote Sens. 2021, 13, 4607 16 ofq Figure 9. Regressions of observed ln chl-a to (a) [(R/G) N] outcomes for OWT-Aq; (b) (B/G) outcomes q OWT-Bq; (c) (B N) for for OWT-Cq ; (d) (R) for OWT-Dq ; (e) (B/N) for BMS-986094 Data Sheet OWT-Eq ; (f) [G(B G R)] for OWT-Fq ; (g) [(B/G) (R/N)] for OWT-Gq ; for OWT-Cq; (d) (R) for OWT-Dq; (e) (B/N) for OWT-Eq; (f) [G(B G R)] for OWT-Fq; (g) [(B/G) (R/N)] for OWT-Gq; and and (h) [(R/B) (R/N)] for all lakes (“global”). (h) [(R/B) (R/N)] for all lakes (“global”).Figure 9. Regressions of observed ln chl-a to (a) [(R/G) N] final results for OWT-A ; (b) (B/G) results for OWT-B ; (c) (B N)Remote Sens. 2021, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEWRemote Sens. 2021, 13, 4607 17 ofFigure ten. Ten-fold cross validation final results for linear regression predictions of observed chl-a to (a) [(R/G) N] final results fo OWT-Aq ; (b) (B/G) results for OWT-Bq ; (c) (B N) for OWT-Cq ; (d) (R) for OWT-Dq ; (e) (B/N) for OWT-Eq ; (f) [G(B G OWT-Aq; (b) OWT-F outcomes for (R/N)] q; (c) (B N) for OWT-Cq; (R/N)] for allOWT-Dq; (e) (B/N) for OWT-Eq; (f) [G(B G (B/G) ; (g) [(B/G) OWT-B for OWT-G ; and (h) [(R/B) (d) (R) for lakes (“global”). R)] for q q R)] for OWT-Fq; (g) [(B/G) (R/N)] for OWT-Gq; and (h) [(R/B) (R/N)] for all lakes (“global”).Figure ten. Ten-fold cross validation benefits for linear regression predictions of observed chl-a to (a) [(R/G) N] final results formote Sens.Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 4607 Evaluation 2021, 13, x FOR PEER18 of18 ofFigure 11.(15 August 2021, path = 17, row modelled chl-adone per pixel and central astern Ontario utilizing a Landsat 8 image (15 Retrieved OWTs (a) and =29). Retrieval is (g L-1) (b) in consequently a lake might represent greater than one OWT. August 2021, pathprovided by ESRI, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, per pixelGeographics, CNES/Airbus DS, represent more than a single OWT. Basemap = 17, row =29). Retrieval is done Earthstar and therefore a lake could USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, Basemap provided by ESRI, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and t.
