Ples had been ten . The detection limits of Cr, Mn, Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd and Pb have been 0.four, 0.02, 0.three, 0.6, two.0, 0.03 and two.0 mg/kg, respectively. To make sure the reliability and high-quality of 0.02, 0.3, 0.6, two.0, 0.03 and two.0 mg/kg, respectively. To make sure the reliability and high-quality of the data, typical reference soil (GBW07408) was bought in the Center of National the information, common reference soil (GBW07408) was bought from the Center of National Reference 1-Dodecanol-d25 Biological Activity Supplies of China. Recovery values, ranging from 90 to 108 . All observed Reference Supplies of China. Recovery values, rangingdeviations (RSD) were reduce than outcomes have been corrected with Clindamycin palmitate (hydrochloride) In Vitro blanks. The relative common from 90 to 108 . All observed benefits ten . were corrected with blanks. The relative normal deviations (RSD) were decrease than ten . two.3. Evaluation Method of Heavy Metals two.three. Evaluation Strategy of Heavy Metals two.three.1. Pollution Evaluation 2.3.1.PI, NIPI, PLI and Igeo [346] have been selected to assess the pollution level of heavy metals Pollution Evaluation in Handan soil. PIand Igeo [346] have been chosen to assess the pollutionsingleof heavy metals PI, NIPI, PLI and Igeo are generally utilized to assess the pollution of a level pollutant. NIPI and PLI had been used to Igeo are typically applied to assess the pollution many pollutant. The in Handan soil. PI andevaluate the comprehensive pollution ofof a singlepollutants. NIPI calculation system to evaluate the and PLI were applied is as follows: comprehensive pollution of multiple pollutants. The C calculation method is as follows: PIi = i (1) C0 Igeoi = log2 PIi 1.5 (two)Appl. Sci. 2021, 11,four ofN IPI = PLIn = PLIzone =n i( PIi )max 2 + PIi(3) (4) (five)PI1 PI2 PI3 PIiPLI1 PLI2 PLI3 PLInwhere PIi represents pollution index of ith metal. Ci and C0 (mg/kg) stand for the content material of ith metal and its background value. The background values refer to the background values of soil components in China [37]. (PIi )max represents the maximum PIi . Igeoi stands for the geo-accumulation index of ith metal. NIPI represents the Nemerow integrated pollution index. PLIn stands for the pollution load index in the nth sampling website. PLIzone represents the pollution load index across the study region. 2.three.two. Ecological Threat Evaluation Strategy The calculation process on the prospective ecological threat index (PERI) is as follows [38]: RI =i =Ei = Ti PIii =nn(6)exactly where RI could be the pollutants’ total ecological threat, Ei represents the ecological threat of ith metal, Ti denotes the toxic response issue [34]. The toxic response element of Cr, Mn, Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd and Pb were two, 1, 5, 5, 1, 30 and five, respectively. The classification common of PI, Igeo , PLI, NIPI, and PERI is revealed in Table S1 [8]. 2.three.three. Health Risk Evaluation Strategy The caluclation of your wellness danger is as follows: ADDing = C ADDdermal = C IngR EF ED 10-6 EBW AT (7) (8) (9) (10) (11)SA AF ABS EF ED 10-6 EBW AT InhR EF ED PEF EBW AT ADDi R f DiADDinh = C HI =HQi =CR =ADDi SFiwhere ADDing , ADDdermal , and ADDinh would be the mean everyday exposure dose to ingestion, dermal and inhalation absorption from soil heavy metals (mg/kg/d) [8]. C stands for the content of metal in soil (mg/kg). A detailed description on the other parameters is usually found in Tables S2 and S3. HQi represents the non-carcinogenic threat of ith heavy metal, though HI stands for the total non-carcinogenic threat [39]. When HI or HQ 1, the risk is small or negligible. When HI or HQ 1, the metal could have a non-carcinogenic danger. CR represents carcinogenic danger.
