Ntral.com/1471-2326/9/type. Although in a recent A-836339MedChemExpress A-836339 report, Baccarani and coworkers reported that such patients need higher doses of imatinib and usually relapse [11], this does not appear to be absolutely the rule [5,17], since in our cohort 2 HES patients remain in PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27486068 CHR and clinical remission, receiving 100 and 400 mg of imatinib, respectively, as maintenance treatment. Moreover, we treated another patient with primary eosinophilia, whose diagnosis was ultimately systemic mastocytosis. Regardless of the presence or absence of FIP1L1PDGFRA or C-KIT-D816V, patients with SM may present with eosinophilia [21]. It is well documented today that some of these patients carry the FIP1L1-PDGFRA rearrangement and are sensitive to imatinib treatment, suggesting that the molecular pathogenesis for this subset of patients is similar to that of CEL [14,21]. Indeed, it has been recently proposed that these patients should be appropriately classified as systemic mastocytosis-CEL [21]. However, our patient was negative for the FIP1L1PDGFRA rearrangement, as well as for the C-KIT-D816V mutation, and did not respond to imatinib treatment.3. 4. 5.6. 7.8.9.ConclusionAn early diagnosis of FIP1L1-PDGFRA-positive CEL and imatinib treatment can offer to affected patients an excellent clinical therapeutic result, avoiding undesirable morbidity and mortality. Moreover, although the molecular mechanisms underlying disease pathogenesis and phenotype remain to be determined, imatinib can also be effective in patients with idiopathic HES.10.11.Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.12.Authors’ contributionsMS was primarily responsible for this work, from conception to submission of the manuscript and wrote the paper. GL carried out the molecular genetic studies and helped drafting of the manuscript. FK carried out the flow cytometric analyses and contributed to the data interpretation. NG, EP and PM participated in study design and the collection and interpretation of data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.13.14.15.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank Prof. AE Germenis and Dr. V Karanikas for critical appraisal of the manuscript. 16.
Serpa et al. BMC Blood Disorders 2010, 10:7 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2326/10/RESEARCH ARTICLEOpen AccessMolecular measurement of BCR-ABL transcript variations in chronic myeloid leukemia patients in cytogenetic remissionMariana Serpa1,2, Sabri S Sanabani3,4, Pedro Enrique Dorliac-Llacer1, Monika Conchon1, Thales Dalessandro Meneguin Pereira1, Luciana Nardinelli1, Juliana Lima Costa1, Mafalda Megumi Yoshinaga Novaes1, Patricia de Barros Ferreira1, Israel Bendit1*AbstractBackground: The monitoring of BCR-ABL transcript levels by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) has become important to assess minimal residual disease (MRD) and standard of care in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). In this study, we performed a prospective, sequential analysis using RT-qPCR monitoring of BCR-ABL gene rearrangements in blood samples from 91 CML patients in chronic phase (CP) who achieved complete cytogenetic remission (CCyR) and major molecular remission (MMR) throughout imatinib treatment. Methods: The absolute level of BCR-ABL transcript from peripheral blood was serially measured every 4 to 12 weeks by RT-qPCR. Only level variations > 0.5 , according to the international scale, was considered positive. Sequential cytogenetic analysis was also per.
