Approved by the institutional review board of Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology (PKUSSIRB-2011007) and written informed consent was obtained from each participant in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.Cell CulturePrimary culture of hGF and hPDLC was carried out according to our previous methods [29]. In brief, hPDLC were obtained from extracted third molars of 5 young healthy volunteers, and hGF was isolated from the gingiva of the same 5 donors. The periodontal ligament tissues 1676428 attached to the middle third of the roots were curetted gently by a surgical scalpel, minced and placed in 24-well plates. Gingivae were also minced and transferred into 24-well plates. Tissue explants were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM; Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with 10 (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS; PAA, Coelbe, Germany), 100 U/mL penicillin G and 100 mg/mL streptomycin. Cultures were maintained in a humidified atmosphere of 5 (v/v) CO2 at 37uC. After reaching 80 confluence, hGF and hPDLC were digested with a mixture of 0.25 (w/v) trypsin and 0.02 (w/v) EDTA, and subcultured at a 1:3 ratio. DMEM without phenol red (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), 10 (v/v) dextran-coated, charcoal-stripped FBS (DCC-FBS; TBD, Tianjin, China) and hGF and hPDLC of passage 4 were used in all the following experiments. All experiments were 25837696 conducted in triplicate. The prostate cancer cell line, PC-3 (American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD, USA), was cultured in RPMI 1640 (Gibco, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) supplemented with 10 (v/v) FBS (FBS; PAA, Coelbe, Germany) in a humidified atmosphere of 5 CO2 at 37uC and was used when the cells were in the logarithmic phase and reached 80 confluence.Figure 5. The efficiency of RNA interference against CYP27A1 and CYP2R1. hGF and hPDLC from donors 2, 4 and 5 were transfected with a siRNA oligonucleotide for CYP27B1, a siRNA oligonucleotide for CYP2R1, or a non-silencing control. Using real-time PCR as a measure, the efficiency of RNA interference against CYP27A1 and CYP2R1 was over 70 in hGF and hPDLC. The data are presented as the mean 6 SD. * denotes difference from negative controls (p,0.05). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052053.gexpression of CYP27A1 mRNA, whereas sodium butyrate could not. It was reported that Pg-LPS is the ligand of Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) and TLR4 [40,41] and that both hGF and hPDLC expressed TLR2 and TLR4 [42]. Upon ligand binding, TLR2 or TLR4-mediated signaling could activate signal transduction, 
leading to NF-kB activation [43,44]. Thus, NF-kB might be involved in the regulation of CYP27A1 expression, an observation that warrants further investigation. Each donor supplied both hGF and hPDLC in the present study. Although hGF and hPDLC are two different kinds of cells, they shared many features in 25-hydroxylase expression, activity and regulation, and only subtle differences were detected. As shown in Fig. 6, when CYP2R1 was knocked down, 25OHD3 generation by hGF was not changed significantly, whereas 25OHD3 generation by hPDLC was purchase SPI1005 affected slightly. However,Cytotoxicity Test of Vitamin DhGF and hPDLC of three donors were used in the cytotoxicity test. hGF and hPDLC in their logarithmic growth phase were plated into 96-well plates at a density of 3000 cells/well in DMEM with 10 DCC-FBS, and the medium was Madrasin price replaced by DMEM without DCC-FBS after 24 h. After another 24 h, the mediumPeriodontal 25-Hydroxylase ActivityFigure 6. Effect of knock.Approved by the institutional review board of Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology (PKUSSIRB-2011007) and written informed consent was obtained from each participant in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.Cell CulturePrimary culture of hGF and hPDLC was carried out according to our previous methods [29]. In brief, hPDLC were obtained from extracted third molars of 5 young healthy volunteers, and hGF was isolated from the gingiva of the same 5 donors. The periodontal ligament tissues 1676428 attached to the middle third of the roots were curetted gently by a surgical scalpel, minced and placed in 24-well plates. Gingivae were also minced and transferred into 24-well plates. Tissue explants were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM; Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with 10 (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS; PAA, Coelbe, Germany), 100 U/mL penicillin G and 100 mg/mL streptomycin. Cultures were maintained in a humidified atmosphere of 5 (v/v) CO2 at 37uC. After reaching 80 confluence, hGF and hPDLC were digested with a mixture of 0.25 (w/v) trypsin and 0.02 (w/v) EDTA, and 
subcultured at a 1:3 ratio. DMEM without phenol red (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), 10 (v/v) dextran-coated, charcoal-stripped FBS (DCC-FBS; TBD, Tianjin, China) and hGF and hPDLC of passage 4 were used in all the following experiments. All experiments were 25837696 conducted in triplicate. The prostate cancer cell line, PC-3 (American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD, USA), was cultured in RPMI 1640 (Gibco, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) supplemented with 10 (v/v) FBS (FBS; PAA, Coelbe, Germany) in a humidified atmosphere of 5 CO2 at 37uC and was used when the cells were in the logarithmic phase and reached 80 confluence.Figure 5. The efficiency of RNA interference against CYP27A1 and CYP2R1. hGF and hPDLC from donors 2, 4 and 5 were transfected with a siRNA oligonucleotide for CYP27B1, a siRNA oligonucleotide for CYP2R1, or a non-silencing control. Using real-time PCR as a measure, the efficiency of RNA interference against CYP27A1 and CYP2R1 was over 70 in hGF and hPDLC. The data are presented as the mean 6 SD. * denotes difference from negative controls (p,0.05). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052053.gexpression of CYP27A1 mRNA, whereas sodium butyrate could not. It was reported that Pg-LPS is the ligand of Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) and TLR4 [40,41] and that both hGF and hPDLC expressed TLR2 and TLR4 [42]. Upon ligand binding, TLR2 or TLR4-mediated signaling could activate signal transduction, leading to NF-kB activation [43,44]. Thus, NF-kB might be involved in the regulation of CYP27A1 expression, an observation that warrants further investigation. Each donor supplied both hGF and hPDLC in the present study. Although hGF and hPDLC are two different kinds of cells, they shared many features in 25-hydroxylase expression, activity and regulation, and only subtle differences were detected. As shown in Fig. 6, when CYP2R1 was knocked down, 25OHD3 generation by hGF was not changed significantly, whereas 25OHD3 generation by hPDLC was affected slightly. However,Cytotoxicity Test of Vitamin DhGF and hPDLC of three donors were used in the cytotoxicity test. hGF and hPDLC in their logarithmic growth phase were plated into 96-well plates at a density of 3000 cells/well in DMEM with 10 DCC-FBS, and the medium was replaced by DMEM without DCC-FBS after 24 h. After another 24 h, the mediumPeriodontal 25-Hydroxylase ActivityFigure 6. Effect of knock.
